I read this book for the Mount TBR Reading Challenge hosted over
at My
Reader’s Block from January 1 – December 31, 2016. The challenge is to read
books that you already own.
The Case of the
Curious Bride – Erle Stanley Gardner
A curious woman claiming not to be a bride consults lawyer Perry
Mason about her "friend" whose husband, supposedly killed in a plane
crash, turns up alive and well. Della Street, Mason’s assistant, is sure the
would-be client is in fact a bride.
After a series of unlucky events, the curious, truth-bending client ends up facing charges of murder. All the evidence points to her guilt, of course, so Perry Mason requires cunning and mother-wit – not to mention a lot of PI legwork that he does himself - to save the client.
After a series of unlucky events, the curious, truth-bending client ends up facing charges of murder. All the evidence points to her guilt, of course, so Perry Mason requires cunning and mother-wit – not to mention a lot of PI legwork that he does himself - to save the client.
Published in 1934, the fifth Perry Mason mystery was a pretty
good read. However, it has a hard edge to it, probably because the Depression
casts a shadow over the characters and action. A millionaire businessman
demonstrates the ethics and morality of an alley cat, reflecting public
attitudes that were fed up with The Conscience-free Rich in the early Thirties. Plus, near
the end, Mason coldly observes that the murder victim – a con man who swindled
plain janes in marriage and then stole all their money – “needed killing.”
Yikes, people often act like brutes but that doesn’t give folks leave to knock
them off as if they were brutes through and through.
In the intricate plot, Mason is always a couple of moves
ahead of the DA and cops. Planting fake evidence will do that, I suppose. I did
not figure out who the culprit was before the end and I was blind-sided by the
reveal. To be fair, I must say that
Gardner plays fair with reader. He has different characters repeat the basic
facts of the case, so we readers can’t complain at the end that Gardner expects
us to know things we were never told. I think Gardner used the repetition
because the novel was serialized in Liberty Magazine (July 7 to September 15, 1934) and he had to get new
readers up to speed.
I liked the antique atmosphere. Despite the hint of
you-know in the title, there is no you-know in the novel, which is par for
Mason novels. The trial sequence, as in many of the early Mason novels, is
pretty short.
No comments:
Post a Comment