I read this book for the 2019 Back
to the Classics Reading Challenge
Classic Comic Novel.
I was going to read a Peter DeVries novel for this category but found it so
outdated that I had to put it down. Strange because outdated usually never puts
me off. But casual asides about domestic abuse, yuck.
Independent
Witness - Henry Cecil
The English judge Henry Cecil (1902 - 1976) wrote comic
legal fiction. Think of John Mortimer’s Rumpole stories, though more gentle and
less acerbic, just as clever, funny, and enjoyable. Cecil’s bag of tricks will
call to mind P.G. Wodehouse in that Cecil uses stock characters like the dumb
colonel, the obsessed widow, the silly young person, etc. But, to my mind,
Cecil writes breezy profound stories set in a recognizable world whereas
Wodehouse writes silly tales set in Neverneverland.
This novel from 1963 describes a hit and run case in
which a member of Parliament is accused of not only hitting a motorcyclist but
fleeing the scene. Cecil has a variety of characters take the stand. The
dialogue-driven examinations should be read slowly and savored. While this is
not a typical whodunit, I still recommend it to mystery fans since there is a
traditional reveal. Cecil’s humor is very English, wise, and humane.
Henry James said that Ulysses S. Grant’s memoirs had a
“hard lucidity.” Cecil’s lucidity is light, with plain prose, dazzling
dialogue, and difficult legal points explained gracefully and comprehensibly. Cecil
was a barrister and high court judge himself so his views on evidence, judges,
juries, lawyers, and clients are worth listening to.
Reading Henry Cecil’s books confirms my belief that the basic vices (the injustice of snobbery, the gluttony of avarice and lust, mean inquisitiveness, etc.) and virtues (self-control, fairness) of human beings haven’t changed and probably won’t change down through the ages. His legal fiction from the Fifites and Sixties is still in print, because his wit, style, intelligence, and deft plotting still provide much interest and sheer reading pleasure.
I did try to read Wodehouse but found him just too silly. I like the idea of comic legal fiction, though. 🙂
ReplyDelete