He meets his neighbor’s wife, an attractive, sexually insatiable and deceitful woman. I’m saying as little about the story as possible. But know that the local scenery, the national character of the Irish at the time, and the theme of being a foreigner (aka the object of intense curiosity) all contribute effectively to the mystery story.
Monday, November 28, 2016
Mount TBR #59
He meets his neighbor’s wife, an attractive, sexually insatiable and deceitful woman. I’m saying as little about the story as possible. But know that the local scenery, the national character of the Irish at the time, and the theme of being a foreigner (aka the object of intense curiosity) all contribute effectively to the mystery story.
Friday, November 25, 2016
Mount TBR #58
- Deception, check: For the very best of reasons, a father and fiancé tell terrible lies to a wistful vulnerable woman.
- Setting, check: Upper middle class or lower upper class family, unspecified Northeastern town.
- Check and double-check: No mother, but a doting father
- Love & marriage as central issue, check: Reconciled to being a spinster, Plain Jane blonde – indeed, we should all be as homely as Dorothy McGuire.
- The bad brunette rival, check: Ruth Roman, of course.
- Point of rivalry, the genial though fickle male, check: boyish Van Johnson, of course.
- Lots of flashbacks, check: to the point of maddening and pointless, in fact.
But that is only half the story. Critics made the mistake of judging the entire genre by its weakest examples, a standard they never applied to gangster films or westerns, both of which produced mountains of forgettable junk. Basinger persuasively argues that the woman's film was often richer, stranger, and more subversive than its reputation suggests. Beneath the glamour, tears, and occasionally crackpot plots, these movies explored the frustrations and contradictions of women's lives in a way Hollywood rarely acknowledged openly.
Jeanine Basinger's A Woman's View is one of those books that quietly demolishes a prejudice many classic-film fans don't even realize they're carrying around. For decades, the "woman's picture" was treated like the poor relation at Hollywood's family reunion: tolerated, patronized, and mocked. The assumption was that movies about romance, marriage, motherhood, and domestic life were somehow less serious than westerns, gangster pictures, war films, or noir. Basinger argues that this critical neglect was partly earned. Plenty of women's pictures were formulaic. Some were flimsy programmers assembled from recycled plots, overheated emotions, and enough sacrificial mothers to populate a small nation.
Modern scholars sometimes dismiss the genre for appearing to reinforce traditional ideas about women and their "proper" place. Basinger counters that Hollywood was not a social reform movement or a political manifesto. It was a business. The studios wanted tickets sold, not revolutions launched. Their goal was to appeal to the broadest audience possible while offending the fewest people. Yet, almost despite themselves, writers, directors, and performers repeatedly smuggled troubling questions into these supposedly conventional stories. The best woman's pictures hint that marriage can be a trap, motherhood can be exhausting, work can be more fulfilling than domesticity, and romance is often a far messier business than Hollywood's happy endings suggest.
Over more than 500 pages, Basinger marshals an army of plot summaries and examples to support her case. Fortunately, she writes for intelligent movie lovers rather than graduate seminars. The prose is clear, lively, funny, and free of academic fog. You can read a few pages before bed and suddenly discover you've stayed up an extra hour chasing Bette Davis, Barbara Stanwyck, or Irene Dunne through another chapter.
Highly recommended for anyone interested in classic Hollywood, especially those who secretly get misty-eyed when, in Dark Victory, Bette Davis gazes into the bright afternoon sky and murmurs, "Ann, there's a storm coming... it's getting darker by the minute." If that scene doesn't get to you, check your pulse.
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Mrs. Lincoln and Mrs. Keckly
Jennifer Fleischner (Department of English, Adelphi University) writes a sympathetic if unsparing portrait of Mary Lincoln. Mary did have an excitable and immoderate temperament. Plus, she was loosely educated, like many Southern women of the day, to play the piano and ride in carriages. Her compulsive shopping – she bought hundreds of pairs of gloves in one shopping trip - had roots in her sorrow and feelings of emptiness.
Her southern family cut off ties with her after the ACW began. She had two of her beloved children die. Lincoln did not love her and when he wasn’t aloof and distant, he acted with bemused and weary tolerance at her vagaries. Her husband was shot in the head with her right next to him. She later lost a third son when he was just a teenager. Her own health was fragile: she suffered migraines and anxiety and she may have been suffering from untreated diabetes (she died of a stroke). This lonely and anguished woman had plenty of trials that would dog anybody, even those better educated and more philosophically equipped than she was.
Mrs. Keckly, on the other hand, Fleischner portrays as a strong figure. Born in slavery, she was raped for four years by a white man. She was impregnated by him and bore his son. She lost this son, who passed as white to join the US Army, when he was killed in his first battle of the ACW. Determined and talented with her needle, she worked as a seamstress (custom dressmaking was required before mass production of clothes). She was able to buy her and her son’s freedom. She built her professional reputation to the point where extremely influential women, such as Varina Davis wife of Jefferson, recommended her to others. That was how Mary Lincoln came to hire her and dominate virtually all her time.
Theirs was a complicated relationship that Fleischner describes clearly and plausibly. Mary Lincoln grew up assuming people would do things for her and make things right when the going got rough. Keckly took on that role, out of true liking, pity, and gratitude because Mary’s husband was the Moses of her people. When Lincoln was assassinated, Mary sent for Mrs. Keckly, though that terrible night Mrs. Keckly was unable to get past the jumpy guards.
Mrs. Keckly was a remarkable woman. She learned to read, write and figure. She owned her own dressmaking business and employed seamstresses. She founded the Contraband Relief Association in August 1862. Mrs. Keckly said that the CRA was formed “for the purpose, not only of relieving he wants of those destitute people, but also to sympathize with, and advise them.” After the ACW, she maintained her relationship with Mary Lincoln and tried to help her with her money problems. Mrs. Keckly wrote Behind the Scenes to defend Mary Lincoln, but due to criticism rooted in racism, sexism, and classism, the book was controversial and disappeared soon after it was published. The book is well worth reading before this one.
Fleischner, mercifully, writes for the general lay reader and avoids the grating jargon of Theory. Her writing style is pleasant to read. I highly recommend this book.
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Warren G. Harding
Almost 700 pages on one of the worst Presidents in history. Pull my other leg, says the wary reader, ever mindful of time and effort.
Russell has a sure touch with the most suitable anecdote and his digressions are many and varied. For instance, he runs off on fascinating tangents such as the ceremonies related to burial of the Unknown Soldier, Harding's suspected Negro ancestry, his inauguration, and his funeral.
He handles at length deeper subjects such as the labyrinth of Ohio politics, the Dark Convention of 1920, and the Teapot Dome Scandal, in which he cuts Fall and Sinclair more slack than one would expect. Even Harry Daugherty comes off better than his unsavory reputation would lead us to believe.
I’m not an expert but even I know that Washington Arms Conference was more important than Russell evaluates it, so I daresay genuine historians have other and more serious problems with this pop bio. But readers who like popular histories would enjoy it, while more jaded readers will wearily observe that empty suits and unqualified buffoons as Presidents are nothing new.
Sunday, November 13, 2016
Bodies in a Bookshop
This narrator of the 1949 mystery gets into a reader’s good graces by observing, “The trouble with bookshops is that they are as bad as pubs. You start with one and then you drift to another, and before you know where you are you are on a gigantic book-binge.”
But in a "curious little shop in a side-street off the Tottenham Court Road," botanist Max Boyle finds not only recondite tomes but also two bodies in a back office filled with gas fumes. He also notices that their heads have been bashed in and that the room is bolted from the outside. Not for the first time, internal evidence says, Boyle calls the long-suffering Yard Chief Inspector Reginald F. Bishop a.k.a. The Bishop. However, Boyle’s flat mate and research mentor Professor John Stubbs horns into the investigation, which reveals a dismal world of blackmail, pornography, and theft of rare books. The suspects are sharply differentiated, the plot speeds up, and in a change of tone and pace, the reveal is outstanding.
The Bishop is skeptical of Stubbs’ use of the scientific method. He claims that forming and testing hypotheses, finding them implausible, and starting the process over and over again until the solution that fits the facts is found simply amounts to guessing and throwing explanations out until time, more evidence, and the law of averages ensure that one explanation is probably the right one. Stubbs, a loud beer-quaffing Scot, takes exception to this wording of the scientific method. But in traditional academic style, truth is found through different approaches and more or less good-natured bickering.
Author R. T. Campbell (real name Ruthven Todd) was a Scottish-born literary man who wrote a handful of mysteries. His witty writing style makes up for his jocose repetitions when describing the foibles of Stubbs and The Bishop. Also enjoyable are the superbly drawn characters and vigorous dialogue. Every setting is appropriately claustrophobic.
Friday, November 11, 2016
Mount TBR #57
Friday, November 4, 2016
W.C. Fields: His Follies and Fortunes
This 1949 biography of great comedian remains a wonderful and informative read. Taylor takes Whitey Dukinfield from an abused runaway to national fame as W.C. Fields, showman of the stage, screen, and radio. Fields’ early adversity made him into a wary, suspicious skinflint as if being a comic genius isn’t trial enough to any human being (see Bert Lahr, Lenny Bruce, John Belushi, Jackie Gleason, etc.). This was written before the “tell all” biographies of the 1970s but Taylor does not flinch from stories that make his subject look disagreeable. Any reader who is interested in comedy, vaudeville, and classic Hollywood should do herself a favor and read this very funny -- and sad – book.