I read this book for the Mount TBR Reading Challenge hosted over
at My
Reader’s Block from January 1 – December 31, 2017. The challenge is to read
books that you already own.
Personal note: When this book was published in 1985, the reviews made me want to read it, because I was interested in mass media's effects on culture. But I was wrapping up grad school and looking for work overseas, so I had no time. I finally got around to it after finding this anniversary edition at a used book sale.
Amusing Ourselves
to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business – Neil Postman
In early 2016, a TV
character sang to his pregnant wife Paul Anka’s June 1974 hit “You’re
Having My Baby.” 40 years ago – the wake of Roe v. Wade - the sexist undertone
of “my baby” versus “our baby” was not, I recall vividly, unnoticed. The
National Organization for Women gave Anka the "Keep Her in Her Place"
award for that year. Nowadays this controversy is so forgotten, and
30-something TV writers and actors and producers so oblivious to the meanings and
tones of words, it is as if the last 40 years haven't happened in terms of either mindless sexism or relish for the slushy sentiment of pop music.
Given how little things have changed, then, why the hell not read
a complaint about television’s effect on culture written in the middle 1980s? Especially since digital communication is TV on steroids....
The thesis of this book is as relevant now as it was when it was first published in 1985. Postman’s thesis is that entertainment is the supra-ideology of all discourse on television. Babble drowns anything worth knowing in an information glut, as TV is not suited to thinking and talking, which is not a performing art. Good TV requires a performing art because people watch TV for dynamic images and strong emotions. The nature of American TV has developed along lines that accommodate the way human beings want to watch TV; that is, TV is not a medium for education or propaganda but for endless amusement, incessant distraction.
The thesis of this book is as relevant now as it was when it was first published in 1985. Postman’s thesis is that entertainment is the supra-ideology of all discourse on television. Babble drowns anything worth knowing in an information glut, as TV is not suited to thinking and talking, which is not a performing art. Good TV requires a performing art because people watch TV for dynamic images and strong emotions. The nature of American TV has developed along lines that accommodate the way human beings want to watch TV; that is, TV is not a medium for education or propaganda but for endless amusement, incessant distraction.
Visual- and entertainment-oriented TV has degraded public
discourse in education, business, religion, and politics. Postman is not against junk on TV but argues that TV is at its worst
when it is trying to be serious. He cites televised presidential debates as an
example of the impossibility of discussing complex issues like peace in the
Middle East in three minutes for Candidate A, while Candidate B has a minute to
rebut. Postman is not claiming anybody systematically conspired to make TV
technology a tool of suppression
of literate or complex discourse in say, political campaigns and
commercials. It just part and parcel of how we Americans use technology with humdrum
inattention – like popping a smartphone in a toddler’s hand to make him shut up
and then wondering why the little tyke seems unable to look anybody in the eye.
Indeed, things have change little in the last 40 years. We
still live an age of information glut. We have flooded our culture with
technologies that fill our lives with information, mainly about people, places,
and events and situations that are out of our control.
We are at the point where our dealing with too much information, so much it
leads to a situation of meaninglessness. With poor skills at critical thinking
and identifying illogical thinking, many people have no basis for judging what
information is useful or useless. Media does not categorize itself as
worthwhile or worthless so people get lost due to sheer noise. How to help
people get meaning and truth has become an urgent problem. Ironically, near the
end of this book Postman speculates computer technology may help people sort
out the relevant from the irrelevant, but we all have seen how that has worked
out.
The book is a well-written complaint, written in the hope
that the vitality of America can contradict Aldous Huxley’s prophecy in Brave New World that our freedom is
lost because of our immense propensity to be distracted. Readers looking for a
book with intellectual heft and decorum won’t be disappointed by this slim
book.
No comments:
Post a Comment