I read this book for the Back
to the Classics Challenge 2018.
Notes of a Journey
from Cornhill to Cairo – William Makepeace Thackeray
This travel narrative, from 1846, recounts Thackeray’s
trip to places in the east such as Lisbon, Athens,
Constantinople, and Jerusalem. Generally speaking, the descriptions capture
reader interest because T. was a draughtsman and painter himself. This, on Cadiz:
I have seen no
more cheerful and animated sight than the long street leading from the quay
where we were landed, and the market blazing in sunshine, piled with fruit,
fish, and poultry, under many-coloured awnings; the tall white houses with
their balconies and galleries shining round about, and the sky above so blue
that the best cobalt in all the paint-box looks muddy and dim in comparison to
it. There were pictures for a year in that market-place - from the
copper-coloured old hags and beggars [...] to the swaggering dandies of the
market, with red sashes and tight clothes, looking on superbly with a hand on
the hip and a cigar in the mouth.
And this about a quay in Beirut:
How magnificently
blue the water was! - how bright the flags and buildings as they shone above
it, and the lines of the rigging tossing in the bay! The white crests of the
blue waves jumped and sparkled like quicksilver; the shadows were as broad and
cool as the lights were brilliant and rosy; [...] and the mountains beyond were
of an amethyst colour.
Unfortunately, his lack of knowledge and
curiosity about the cultures he visits did not charm me. It reminded me of the
age-old criticism of Thackeray: he just isn’t real smart. He poses as the old
hand with assertions like, “Walk into the bazaar, and the East is unveiled to
you.” How do you know, I, a long-term expatriate of old, would wonder at the cocky knowledge of tourists. Other statements make it sound as if he just dashing off narrative; for instance of Constantinople he says, “I don't think I
have anything more to say about the city which has not been much better told by
graver travellers.” Okay, the reader thinks, then what am I reading this lightweight for?
Who should read this? Readers, I suppose,
who can’t get enough of Thackeray even after Vanity Fair and Barry Lyndon,
I guess. Maybe grad students in cultural studies looking for examples of narrow
mid-Victorian attitudes.
No comments:
Post a Comment