I read this book for the European Reading Challenge
German title: Der
Richter und sein Henker
Year published: 1950
Year Englished: 1954, by Cyrus Brooks
The Judge and His
Hangman - Friedrich Dürrenmatt
It all starts with the discovery by a constable of a police detective’s
corpse, in a car parked near a Swiss village. Commissioner Bärlach, an
old, experienced detective takes the case despite ill health - he has been plagued
with stomach pain that requires a surgery he’s been procrastinating. When Bärlach
discovers that the murdered man had assumed an alias and attended parties at
the house of a certain Herr Gastmann in the village, Bärlach’s investigation is
suddenly sabotaged by his superior Dr. Lucius Lutz. Lutz was put off by Gastmann's
lawyer who implied that Gastmann was getting protection from the highest levels
of the Swiss government, which in turn was being pressured by politicians and arms
manufacturers who do not want their lucrative business disturbed.
By hinting at these kinds of cozy dodgy relationships in
the establishment, the author challenges the complacent majority to think about whether Switzerland was genuinely neutral in WWII. During the war, the
Swiss authorities refused normal diplomatic protection for Jewish Swiss
citizens in Germany and Nazi-occupied countries. Swiss banksters made it
needlessly easy for the Nazis to loot their victims' assets. Switzerland's government
granted generous credits to the criminal regimes of Germany and Italy and
offered them financial privileges. After the war, bankers were not cooperative
with surviving heirs that were trying to find and claim the accounts of their murdered
relatives.
Anyway, Bärlach quickly realizes that Gastmann was an old
opponent, who, as a young man, had murdered an innocent man in cold-blood, on a
bet. Since then, Bärlach had been following this man, who always took on new
aliases, but could never pin anything on him. Bärlach realizes that he must
continue his investigations in order to produce a just end which cannot be
reached in legal ways.
Thus, given the moral and ethical failures of the
authorities and captains of the banking industry, the author examines the
character of a disillusioned individual who does not battle the ordinary unfolding
of events with a bureaucratic protocol but with his own sense
of right and wrong. Bärlach is convinced that criminals are caught when the
police can exploit the criminal’ mistakes in planning, executing, and covering
up a crime. Crooks are humans and humans are fallible because nobody - however fiendishly clever- can
predict how reality will turn out in the wake of a crime. His nemesis Gastmann,
however, argues that the chaotic “entanglement of human relationships” lends
itself to unsolvable crimes and lack of proof that could stand in a court of
law.
Again because it is very short, it is worthwhile to read
it twice: the first time as a crime novel for the sake of untangling the plot’s
the surprising twists and the second time as a jumping off point for curious
philosophical questions and issues in cognitive psychology, if that is the reader’s bent.
I should re-read this one. I barely remember anything. That is a great point about the complicity of the Swiss in WWII.
ReplyDelete