I read this book for the Back
to the Classics Challenge 2017.
The Complete Short
Novels – Anton Chekhov
Anton Chekhov (1860 - 1904) mastered the short story form,
but early in his career he wrote novellas. This volume collects five works Englished by the well-known team Richard Pevear and Larissa
Volokhonsky.
The first story, The
Steppe, is apparently about the journey of a young boy across the steppe of
southern Russia. I say “apparently” because there is no plot. Despite the
journey, the form is neither a quest nor a picaresque. A merchant and a priest
are travelling on business and to kill two birds with one stone they are
talking the boy to a larger town so he can go to school. Along the way, they meet a variety of
characters, from a compassionate Russian mama to cold merchants preoccupied
with gain to a Jewish trickster that calls to mind Diogenes. They have
adventures, such as a session of scary crime stories around the fire, and
misadventures, such as king-hell thunderstorm. The descriptions of nature bring
to mind another plotless masterpiece, Dead
Souls by Gogol. Very stirring is the
immense steppe – nature – as a backdrop for the smallness and fragility of
human life.
In The Duel,
Chekhov tells a simple story to expose the ethical dilemmas of the characters. Set in a small town in the Caucasus, both the
locals and occupying Russians live their lives without unusual mishaps or
misfortunes and with the certainty that tomorrow will unfold in the same way as
today. To this humdrum burg, a young couple has arrived from St. Petersburg:
Lévsky and Nadejda Fyodorovna. He is a civil servant and she is married to
another man. Lévsky is a superfluous man
who, although he holds a public office and has a rich social life, can’t be
said to have ever accomplished anything new or original or admirable in his
life. He lives at the expense of others, doing his job as little as possible, blithely
incurring debt, stealing another man’s impressionable wife, and dragging her to
a junky little town, far from her people and her friends. But he is starting to
detest Nadejda Fyodorovna who isn’t nearly as clever as she is vain and is a
creature of impulse. To this same podunk returns every year Von Koren, a
zoologist with cold and radical ideas about the wholesale improvement of the
county. He can’t stand Lévsky, who embodies everything he abhors about dilettante intellectuals.
Von Koren has the kind fo mind eagerly recruited by the
Bolsheviks later, a mind that would contemplate with relish the liquidation of
whole classes of people. Though Von Koren does not sympathize with Lévsky's
problems, it is he who, in the end, ends up giving Lévsky a solution to his
no-exit, no-serenity life. At the beginning the tone is relaxed, but gets more
intense as the extent of Lévsky and Nadejda Fyodorovna’s problems become
apparent. Chekhov effectively puts
across the ghastly dead-ends that people find themselves in.
The Story of an
Unknown Man opens with a revolutionary telling us readers he has taken a
job a servant in the St. Petersburg house of the son of a high official in
order to gather information about that official. He hints that an assassination
plot in in the works. But the political goals are lost as the narrator observes
the tortured souls in a love triangle. He also meets the old official and
pities the old duff for his frailty: “It’s hard to strike a match against a
crumbling wall.” He also feels strange, along with us readers, that becoming a
servant has dehumanized him in the eyes of the household; they act as if he is
not in the room. Despite this cruel incuriosity that reduces him to an object,
he feels sympathy for people that are so weak and apathetic that they can’t
even protect themselves from thieving servants. No wonder the Bolsheviks were
able to shove them out of way so easily.
In Three Years,
Chekhov deals with an unlikely love story. For no particular reason, Laptev falls
passionately in love with Yulia. She hardly knows he is alive, but afraid of
becoming an old maid, she is gradually worn down. Reader - she marries him!
They then settle down to gamely, grimly make the best of a marriage. Like in
Woody Allen’s spoof Love
and Death, all the characters love somebody that is unattainable. In a set of
pitiless stories more or less about love among imperfect human beings, this
story is the most merciless. Readers who half-assing through a
marriage –beware.
In My Life: The
Story of a Provincial, the pretentiously named Misail, under the influence
of Tolstoy, renounces his noble name and reputation. His father is outraged,
his sister begs Misail to relent. The townspeople throw water on him, charging
he is breaking the commandment to honor one’s parents. The village urchins call
him an ugly child nickname. Misail and the liberal Masha marry and move out of
the provincial town to a country estate. The couple is subjected to the indignity
and idiocy and drunkenness of village life. The muzhiks also remorselessly cheat
them and steal from them. As a chorus to these disillusioning goings-on, the
doctor take the stance of the cool intellectual who sympathizes with everybody’s
problems but in unable to frame any ideas toward solutions. Like most Russian
writers, Chekhov is dealing with the “whither Mother Russia” issue, but he
highlights all the personal and psychological problems that distract the
characters from being active agents of change, sociologically speaking. In this
story, everybody, at every level of society, seems stuck in a rut – who can say
of whose making? And the reader feels that some of the reasons behind Russia’s
terrible 20th century are explored in this late 19th century
story.
I read one of these stories on every other weekend in January
and February, though my original plan was to read one every other month. The
stories were just too excellent to put off. But they are all sad stories. So many
ways to keep it real, so many more to pretend, as we struggle to be good and
struggle even harder to be happy.
Looks like an interesting collection!
ReplyDelete