I read this book for the Back
to the Classics Challenge 2018.
American Humor: A
Study of the National Character – Constance Rourke
Constance Rourke died in late March 1941, at only 56 years old, when
she slipped and fell off the icy porch of her Grand Rapids, Michigan, house. With her untimely death, our country lost a pioneering
scholar of American folk traditions, popular entertainment, and social history.
She not only gathered information, often for the first time, but also analyzed it with a sharp yet sympathetic attitude.
She was among the scholars of the time who were concerned
about the rise of fascism and communism between the wars so she wrote
popularized history in order to remind the American people of who they are and
the ideals they had better be ready to defend.
This ambitious book was published in 1931. It divides folkways
of entertainment into a number of curious topics: the Yankee peddler and
backwoodsman as American types; the minstrel show; trouping performers and
strollers; and religious cultists as entertainers giving drudges respite. She shrewdly examines forgotten comic
writers like Petroleum V. Nasby (Lincoln’s favorite funny man) and classic
American writers such as Poe, Hawthorne, Whitman, Emerson, Melville, Howells
and Henry James. She persuasively juxtaposes Lincoln as a major literary figure
and one whose storytelling prowess is in the American tradition of tall tales
and joke-telling.
Rourke is apparently little read and little cited these days
in American Studies, though her work was seminal for years after her decease.
One problem for us post-moderns is that she doesn’t know anything about anthropology or ethnology.
Although her recognition of Lincoln as a literary figure is discerning and prescient,
sometimes the literary criticism feels labored, stretched. Hawthorne as a teller of folk
tales seems weak. Ditto with Moby Dick
an outgrowth of joke books of the day because of its risible Biblical names and
puns. Still, for readers into the history of pop culture, this book might be
worth reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment