Monday, October 15, 2018

Mount TBR #26

I read this book for the Mount TBR 2018 Reading Challenge.

The Case of the Drowsy Mosquito – Erle Stanley Gardner

His doc told Banning Clarke to take it easy on account of his iffy heart. But Banning Clarke’s old prospecting pard Salty Bowers urges him to stop babying himself, that old prospectors go downhill in a jiffy if they don’t live under sun and stars and tramp all day looking for precious metals. So Banning Clarke takes to sleeping in the rock garden of his mansion which has been planted with cactus and saltbush.

His doc has insisted that nurse Velma Starler live there 24-7, ever ready with medication and cautions to take it easy. Also living in the mansion are his in-laws the Bradissons (mother and son), the son’s mining broker Hayward Small, and his cook-housekeeper Nell Sims and her con-man husband.

Banning Clarke has retained ace lawyer Perry Mason to represent him in a fraud case. The plot thickens when the Bradissons and then Perry and his assistant Della Street are poisoned with arsenic. After the inevitable murder, an interesting legal question comes up: who is culpable for the killing if the victim is shot after ingesting a big bad dose of arsenic?

This is doubtless one of the best Masons I’ve read, and I’ve read a couple dozen of them. To appeal to the kid in us, he has material about the legendary lost gold mines of California.  The legal twists are so positively serpentine that Mason gets ahead of himself. It’s an illustration too that Gardner respected his readers enough that he trusted their intelligence to follow the complex legal reasoning of the opposing attorneys.

Gardner puts in more comic relief that usual, with PI Paul Drake posing as a drunken prospector and Nell Sims as a known Mrs. Malaprop who mangles maxims and proverbs as in “A stich in time saves a pound of cure.” While Gardner’s nature writing about the austere beauty of the desert is not exactly W.H. Hudson, it enjoyable to read his advocacy of the simple outdoors life and nature’s ascetic lessons of self-reliance and resilience. Finally, as the novel was written in 1942, during WW2, the topical references give us postmoderns a sense of how the rationing of sugar, for example, influenced daily behavior of ordinary people.

No comments:

Post a Comment